FLAVE vs squirrelly
When comparing FLAVE vs squirrelly, the Slant community recommends FLAVE for most people. In the question“What are the best JavaScript templating engines?” FLAVE is ranked 26th while squirrelly is ranked 32nd. The most important reason people chose FLAVE is:
Syntax Highlighting extensions for Atom and VSCODE
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Syntax Highlighting
Syntax Highlighting extensions for Atom and VSCODE
Pro JavaScript allowed in views
Pro Helper functions
Can write pure JavaScript helper functions to include in the view file.
Pro Multiple Templates in a single file
Optionally encapsulate views within a class as well as have as many view as you want.
Pro Not white space sensitive
Pro Blazing Fast
In most templating benchmarks, Squirrelly equals or outperforms the speed of other templating engines.
Pro Rich and customizable features
Squirrelly supports custom helpers, partials, and filters.
Pro Not language-bound
Squirrelly isn't tied to a specific language, like HTML. That means that you can use it to generate files of all kinds, from Markdown to JavaScript to SVGs.
Pro No whitespace worries
Squirrelly is not whitespace sensitive.
Pro Super simple
Squirrelly has syntax like Mustache or Swig, and you can write your first template in a few minutes! It also works with ExpressJS right out of the box.
Cons
Con Limited support and testing
Con No data binding
Flave only generates HTML.