When comparing Material Components for the Web vs MUI CSS, the Slant community recommends MUI CSS for most people. In the question“What are the best frameworks/libraries for implementing material design on the web?” MUI CSS is ranked 5th while Material Components for the Web is ranked 8th. The most important reason people chose MUI CSS is:
Simple animations without too much fanciness keep the performance high and size small.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Can be wrapped in common frameworks
There's already wrappers for Vue, Angular, etc.
Pro Web components
Pro Open Source
Pro Framework Agnostic
No dependency on Angular, Polymer, React or any other.
Pro Made by the core Material Design development team
Pro Fast
Simple animations without too much fanciness keep the performance high and size small.
Pro Lightweight
11KB minified and gzipped
Pro No external dependencies
Pro Grid system - the same as Bootstrap
12-column grid
Pro WebComponents library
Pro HTML Email library
Pro React library
Pro Customizable using SASS
The MUI CSS can be easily customized by using the SASS files available on GitHub and via Bower. Customize breakpoints, font-settings and use Material Design colors.