Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing Atlas vs Turbo FTP Client, the Slant community recommends Turbo FTP Client for most people. In the question“What are the best Material Design apps?” Turbo FTP Client is ranked 58th while Atlas is ranked 71st. The most important reason people chose Turbo FTP Client is:
Turbo FTP is developed within the Material Design guidelines making for a nice looking FTP app on Android that has a familiar interface for anyone familiar with Material Design.
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Built-in ad blocking
The browser uses EasyList data to remove ads from sites. It can further be supplemented with EasyPrivacy data to limit website ability to track you.
Pro Stores preferences on per-site basis
The browser can be set to remember which sites need to be shown in desktop mode, with certain content filtering settings, etc.
Pro Can browse two tabs at once
Atlas has a dual pane view that shows two pages side by side.
Pro Can be set to very low data usage
Pro Material design
Turbo FTP is developed within the Material Design guidelines making for a nice looking FTP app on Android that has a familiar interface for anyone familiar with Material Design.
Pro Supports multiple FTP configurations
Turbo FTP client handles FTP, FTPS, FTPES and SFTP protocols, making for a wide array of configurations that Turbo FTP Client can work with, no matter the FTP it needs to connect to or share.
Pro Multiview support
For Samsung devices that can use the multiview feature, Turbo FTP Client can utilize multiple windows.
Cons
Con Abandoned
Atlas was last updated on September 19, 2014.
Con Outdated
This app was last updated in July 2015, so there are potential vulnerabilities
Con Has low memory issues
Turbo FTP Client may run in to problems with a device running out of memory during a transfer, meaning the app will crash due to Android memory management. Making it difficult to successfully pull off transfers as well as use any other application during a transfer.
