AgoraPulse vs Buffer
When comparing AgoraPulse vs Buffer, the Slant community recommends Buffer for most people. In the question“What are the best social media managers?” Buffer is ranked 1st while AgoraPulse is ranked 9th. The most important reason people chose Buffer is:
Buffer integrates tightly with Chrome, allowing instant scheduling for website links, highlighted text, and images.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Automatically finds influencers
AgoraPulse will find which users most often mention you and show them to you.
Pro Great for managing conversations
AgoraPulse emulates the way email clients keep hold of conversations. All incoming conversations are in a folder called "Inbox". Clicking on a conversation will display the whole thread and allow you to respond to the conversations right there. It helps you make sure you don't miss anything.
Pro Excellent Chrome extension
Buffer integrates tightly with Chrome, allowing instant scheduling for website links, highlighted text, and images.
Pro Easy to use
Pro Pre-build a schedule independent of content
Instead of creating a post and then scheduling it, Buffer starts with the schedule and then inserts your posts into it sequentially. (Prior to actual distribution, scheduled posts can be re-ordered.) Immediate posts and "normal" per-post scheduling are also available.
Pro Excellent mobile support
Buffer's iOS and Android apps are frequently praised for their functionality and ease of use.
Cons
Con Expensive
Starts at $19/mo.
Con Lacks G+ support
Con Limited free service
The free service is very very limited.