Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 vs LG 34WK95U, the Slant community recommends BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 for most people. In the question“What are the best monitors?” BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 is ranked 68th while LG 34WK95U is ranked 219th. The most important reason people chose BenQ ZOWIE XL2540 is:
When hooked up with an AMD's graphics card, this monitor doesn't experience problems with screen tearing thanks to its FreeSync support. FreeSync allows the monitor to synchronize its refresh rate with the framerate of your AMD's GPU.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Supports FreeSync
When hooked up with an AMD's graphics card, this monitor doesn't experience problems with screen tearing thanks to its FreeSync support. FreeSync allows the monitor to synchronize its refresh rate with the framerate of your AMD's GPU.
Pro Fast
The BenQ XL2540 is one of the fastest gaming monitors available on the market which makes it an ideal solution for the competitive action gamers out there. The monitor offers the combination of insanely high native refresh rate and low input lag. Additionally, motion doesn't look washed out thanks to the monitor's high pixel response time.
Pro 5K resolution
The LG 34WK95U is an excellent option for those who aren't satisfied with the current-generation 4K displays thanks to its resolution that measures at 5120x3840 pixels.
Pro Has a USB-C port
The monitor's USB-C port receive a video signal, run the 34WK95U's integrated USB hub, and charge peripherals - all at once. It is fully compatible with the Thunderbolt 3 interface.
Pro Has a USB-C port
The monitor's USB-C port receive a video signal, run the 34WK95U's integrated USB hub, and charge peripherals - all at once. It is fully compatible with the Thunderbolt 3 interface.
Pro Has a USB-C port
The monitor's USB-C port receive a video signal, run the 34WK95U's integrated USB hub, and charge peripherals - all at once. It is fully compatible with the Thunderbolt 3 interface.
Cons
Con Needs to be calibrated
You'd need to spend some time calibrating this monitor because its default color accuracy is abysmal. The monitor's default color inaccuracy measures at around 4.0 dE - high enough to be seen by a human eye.
Con Needs to be calibrated
You'd need to spend some time calibrating this monitor because its default color accuracy is abysmal. The monitor's default color inaccuracy measures at around 4.0 dE - high enough to be seen by a human eye.
Con Needs to be calibrated
You'd need to spend some time calibrating this monitor because its default color accuracy is abysmal. The monitor's default color inaccuracy measures at around 4.0 dE - high enough to be seen by a human eye.
Con Expensive
There are many equally-sized 4K panels that offer the same functionality as the 34WK95U while costing substantially less.
