When comparing MarkLogic vs MySQL with InnoDB, the Slant community recommends MySQL with InnoDB for most people. In the question“What are the best ACID-compliant scalable databases?” MySQL with InnoDB is ranked 3rd while MarkLogic is ranked 11th. The most important reason people chose MySQL with InnoDB is:
Some of these APIs include ODBC, Java (JDBC), Perl, Python, PHP, Ruby, and native C. Also, there are a number of third party APIs that are available for use to interact with the database
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Search engine native
No other ACID database has even close to the text handling capabilities that are built-in to MarkLogic. Many multi-model databases rely on Lucene to provide text indexing, which leads to unnecessary latency and complexity.
Pro Massively scalable
Configuring MarkLogic for scale out is simple with both APIs and UI based mechanisms to add and manage cluster nodes that auto-shard and redistribute themselves for maximum efficiency.
Pro XML powerhouse
MarkLogic supports XML natively and adheres to all W3C standards surrounding XML. It even uses XQuery as a powerful application engine. Recent editions are also JSON native, which makes it fit in with modern JavaScript and web-centric applications.
Pro Uniquely offers full ACID transactions in a multi-model database
MarkLogic is the only Multi-model database in the world that is fully ACID and treats unstructured content as a first class citizen.
Pro Multiple APIs
Some of these APIs include ODBC, Java (JDBC), Perl, Python, PHP, Ruby, and native C. Also, there are a number of third party APIs that are available for use to interact with the database
Pro Many applications available
There are a number of applications that are built with the focus of MySQL. Some of these include Drupal, Joomla, Wordpress and more.
Pro Scalable
Works well under simple operations or heavy tasks.
Pro Huge community support
Being the world's most popular open source database means there are tons of available examples and information for users' to access.
Cons
Con Enterprise focused
MarkLogic is more focused on the specific needs of enterprise customers who need ACID rigor and element level security. There are less costly options if eventual consistency and application-level security are good enough for you.
Con Proprietary
License is $18k/year
Con Too good to be true
If you are skeptical about product claims, MarkLogic may seem a bit too good to be true. MANY applications could benefit from implementing MarkLogic instead of creaky old RDBMS or immature NoSQL databases or even search engines like Lucene/Solr/Elastic.
Con InnoDB is not fully configured
When you initially install MySQL, InnoDB needs to be configured to make it suite your needs and there are many issues you can come across.