When comparing IPredator vs IVPN, the Slant community recommends IVPN for most people. In the question“What is the best VPN provider? ” IVPN is ranked 13th while IPredator is ranked 21st. The most important reason people chose IVPN is:
You can switch between a single VPN connection (singlehop), or routing your internet traffic through multiple VPN servers (multihop) at any time. The latter increases anonymity, but comes at the cost of a slightly worse performance. Furthermore their multihop system has a built in restriction that dictates that it must be a hop from one country to the next, so no Dallas to LA hop, but because of this there should be nothing too shocking about the overall latency. NY - Toronto - London can still edge under 100ms, LA - SLC - HK hitting 350 - 380ms is pretty normal for everyone. A single hop from Brooklyn to Jersey can be as low as 7ms, with 20ms to Atlanta. To further the point, really this means that if you route through a US node they may throttle you, but it may help to be on a private tracker. It certainly wouldn't affect you if you're connecting from a peer through Canada or Bucharest.
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Equipment is owned not rented
All of IPredator equipment is owned not rented, ensuring that they have a complete control over how the VPN operates.
Pro No traffic or protocol restricitions
Except for SMTP port 25 that is filtered to mitigate e-mail spam.
Pro Multiple payment methods
PayPal, Bitcoins, Payza, PaySon are fully integrated. Credit Cards, OkPay, Transferwise, WU, PerfectMoney, Webmoney on request.
Pro Has 50 servers to choose from
While they have a huge amount of servers compared to other VPNs, these servers are all located in Sweden. Essentially, variety is traded for quantity.
Pro Straightforward pricing
iPredator charges $8 per month, users gain access to their servers using PPTP and OpenVPN protocols.
Pro IPv6 support
Native dual stack with a route-able IPv4 and IPv6 address.
Pro No bandwidth cap
Pro Multihop and Singlehop options
You can switch between a single VPN connection (singlehop), or routing your internet traffic through multiple VPN servers (multihop) at any time. The latter increases anonymity, but comes at the cost of a slightly worse performance. Furthermore their multihop system has a built in restriction that dictates that it must be a hop from one country to the next, so no Dallas to LA hop, but because of this there should be nothing too shocking about the overall latency. NY - Toronto - London can still edge under 100ms, LA - SLC - HK hitting 350 - 380ms is pretty normal for everyone. A single hop from Brooklyn to Jersey can be as low as 7ms, with 20ms to Atlanta.
To further the point, really this means that if you route through a US node they may throttle you, but it may help to be on a private tracker. It certainly wouldn't affect you if you're connecting from a peer through Canada or Bucharest.
Pro Non-persistent logs are kept for 10 minutes
They are kept for troubleshooting reasons.
Pro Multiple payment options
Bitcoin, cash and PayPal are accepted.
Pro No traffic or protocol restricitions except for BitTorrent in US
Except for BitTorrent in US, you can use any and all protocols at your disposal, no traffic is restricted.
Cons
Con Customer service fairly slow and minimal
Con Some information is kept
For debugging purposes some logs are kept. Additionally, emails and transaction ID received are kept for over 6 months inside a separate system.