IPredator vs IVPN

All of IPredator equipment is owned not rented, ensuring that they have a complete control over how the VPN operates.

Except for SMTP port 25 that is filtered to mitigate e-mail spam.

PayPal, Bitcoins, Payza, PaySon are fully integrated. Credit Cards, OkPay, Transferwise, WU, PerfectMoney, Webmoney on request.

While they have a huge amount of servers compared to other VPNs, these servers are all located in Sweden. Essentially, variety is traded for quantity.

iPredator charges $8 per month, users gain access to their servers using PPTP and OpenVPN protocols.

Native dual stack with a route-able IPv4 and IPv6 address.

They are kept for troubleshooting reasons.

Bitcoin, cash and PayPal are accepted.

You can switch between a single VPN connection (singlehop), or routing your internet traffic through multiple VPN servers (multihop) at any time. The latter increases anonymity, but comes at the cost of a slightly worse performance. Furthermore their multihop system has a built in restriction that dictates that it must be a hop from one country to the next, so no Dallas to LA hop, but because of this there should be nothing too shocking about the overall latency. NY - Toronto - London can still edge under 100ms, LA - SLC - HK hitting 350 - 380ms is pretty normal for everyone. A single hop from Brooklyn to Jersey can be as low as 7ms, with 20ms to Atlanta.

To further the point, really this means that if you route through a US node they may throttle you, but it may help to be on a private tracker. It certainly wouldn't affect you if you're connecting from a peer through Canada or Bucharest.

Except for BitTorrent in US, you can use any and all protocols at your disposal, no traffic is restricted.