When comparing Cloak vs IVPN, the Slant community recommends IVPN for most people. In the question“What is the best VPN provider? ” IVPN is ranked 4th while Cloak is ranked 25th. The most important reason people chose IVPN is:
You can switch between a single VPN connection (singlehop), or routing your internet traffic through multiple VPN servers (multihop) at any time. The latter increases anonymity, but comes at the cost of a slightly worse performance. Furthermore their multihop system has a built in restriction that dictates that it must be a hop from one country to the next, so no Dallas to LA hop, but because of this there should be nothing too shocking about the overall latency. NY - Toronto - London can still edge under 100ms, LA - SLC - HK hitting 350 - 380ms is pretty normal for everyone. A single hop from Brooklyn to Jersey can be as low as 7ms, with 20ms to Atlanta. To further the point, really this means that if you route through a US node they may throttle you, but it may help to be on a private tracker. It certainly wouldn't affect you if you're connecting from a peer through Canada or Bucharest.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Does SSL Pinning on OS X
SSL pinning protects against some forms of man-in-the-middle attacks that even SSL encrypted traffic is vulnerable to. Not long ago, iOS did not allow for pinning but that may have changed more recently.
Pro Responsive developer
The developer of Cloak is extremely responsive to feedback and quick to answer questions or support requests.
Pro Senses Trusted WiFi networks
Cloak can be set to not use the VPN on whitelisted WiFI SSIDs (like home/work).
Pro Unlimited devices (as long as they're OSX/iOS)
Unlimited devices and data per account, so you can connect up the whole family or office on one account if you so choose.
Pro Multihop and Singlehop options
You can switch between a single VPN connection (singlehop), or routing your internet traffic through multiple VPN servers (multihop) at any time. The latter increases anonymity, but comes at the cost of a slightly worse performance. Furthermore their multihop system has a built in restriction that dictates that it must be a hop from one country to the next, so no Dallas to LA hop, but because of this there should be nothing too shocking about the overall latency. NY - Toronto - London can still edge under 100ms, LA - SLC - HK hitting 350 - 380ms is pretty normal for everyone. A single hop from Brooklyn to Jersey can be as low as 7ms, with 20ms to Atlanta.
To further the point, really this means that if you route through a US node they may throttle you, but it may help to be on a private tracker. It certainly wouldn't affect you if you're connecting from a peer through Canada or Bucharest.
Pro Wireguard is available
Pro Multiple payment options
Bitcoin, cash and PayPal are accepted.
Pro Token-based account
You can create an account by generating a token and using it to login. If you don't believe it's secure you can also add 2FA.
Pro 2FA Supported
Can setup 2FA for extra security.
Pro Ethical company
Opened and runs DoINeedAVPN.com — A website to determine if you need a VPN or not. IVPN's website also offers a Blog to help determine if other VPN companies are trustworthy, what to ask companies, and other safety practices.
Pro Based in "No Eyes" Country
Company is based in Gibraltar, so IVPN is not obligated to provide access to three letter agencies.
Pro Warrant Canary is provided on their website
You can find it here.
Pro Non-persistent logs are kept for 10 minutes
They are kept for troubleshooting reasons.
Pro No traffic or protocol restricitions except for BitTorrent in US
Except for BitTorrent in US, you can use any and all protocols at your disposal, no traffic is restricted.