When comparing Alpemix vs Chrome Remote Desktop, the Slant community recommends Chrome Remote Desktop for most people. In the question“What are the best ways to share your screen with others?” Chrome Remote Desktop is ranked 2nd while Alpemix is ranked 16th. The most important reason people chose Chrome Remote Desktop is:
All you need to do is install a Chrome extension.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Fast
No difference with others
Pro Cheap
Maybe the chippest comparing to others
Pro Multiplatform
Works on Windows, Linux, OS X, iOS and Android. Works crossplatform very well.
Pro Great support
Very quick email support returns. Less than 1 hour.
Pro Safe
For key transfers, 1024 bit RSA and 256 bit RSA are used. The key that is encoded with 1024 bit RSA can be sent directly. The key that is encoded with 256 bit RSA is not sent directly. The key that is encoded with 256 bit RSA is sent again after being encoded with 256 bit AES.
Pro Easy Setup - No Installation
Download the client from http://www.alpemix.com/site/Alpemix.exe and run only 1 click
Pro Free for personal use
Its free for limited individual usage.
Pro Always Online Remote Desktop ( Service )
You can install Alpemix service for your computer to be able to connect it with only password 24/7.
Pro Multiple remote sessions
you can connect multiple desktops simultaneously.
Pro File sharing
You can share everyting crossplatform
Pro Reliable
Alpemix runs since 2010 to nowaday with %99 uptime.
Pro Good security
For key transfers, 1024 bit RSA and 256 bit RSA are used. The key that is encoded with 1024 bit RSA can be sent directly. The key that is encoded with 256 bit RSA is not sent directly. The key that is encoded with 256 bit RSA is sent again after being encoded with 256 bit AES.
Pro Simple set-up
All you need to do is install a Chrome extension.
Pro Impressively fast
Faster than most similar applications.
Pro Easy to install
Pro Completely free
There are no restrictions on how you use it.
Pro Cross-platform
Works on Windows, Mac and Linux.
Pro Keeps making sure connection is still wanted
Every few minutes the sharer gets a popup asking if they want to continue sharing the screen, while the popup is shown the viewer can't control anything. This is important in case the sharer forgets to close the connection.
Pro Allows viewer to make actions
If the user that shares their screen doesn't touch the mouse/keyboard the viewer can control them which makes it easy take actions instead of explaining by voice.
Cons
Con Single user only
If multiple users want to connect to a device, they have to take turns.