When comparing Zorin OS vs Chakra, the Slant community recommends Chakra for most people. In the question“What are the best Linux distributions for desktops?” Chakra is ranked 23rd while Zorin OS is ranked 29th.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pro Windows desktop style
The desktop UI was made to resemble Windows 7, but alternative settings are available.
Pro Good Selection of pre-installed software
New users may be unaware of what software is available for Linux, but Zorin includes a good selection for everyday tasks out of the box.
Zorin is compatible with Ubuntu's sizable repositories of Free Software.
Pro Bundles tools for changing the look and feel of the distribution
Zorin includes look changer and theme changer.
Pro Partial Windows compatibility
Zorin includes WINE and PlayOnLinux to run many Windows applications and games.
Pro Installer can set up dual boot
Pro Accessibility features
Pro Low resources consumption
Pro Keeps Gnome apps tidier even than Gnome distros
Pro Independent from Arch
its not just another Arch Spin-off
Pro Focuses on KDE/Qt Apps
comes with none GTK apps per default
Con Limited desktop styles in Free Version
All free editions only offer Windows XP, 2000, and 7 and Gnome 2. You have to pay $9-10 in order to get Unity (Ubuntu) and Mac OS X themes.
Con No real installer
Has no installer just a big bloated LiveCD that gets unpacked to your disk.
Con Weak base
Sometimes updates will not execute hooks(full update always misses to run mkinitcpio) so you get an unbootable system.
Compared to deb or rpm it takes ages to update the system, it's also very dumb in dependency tracking.
Con Only available for x86-based CPUs
Con Small development team
The team is very small
Con Uses systemd
Which is very hard to debug and not a *nix standard.
Con Overwrites your default EFI config
It overwrites your default EFI config wich can make you PC unbootable if something goes wrong.