Void Linux vs Microsoft Windows 11

A single instance of Void will be supported forever without needing to reinstall (you can update the system every day instead of having to install one major update every 6 months or so).

More minimalistic than Arch since it doesn't use systemd.

An init system with the "do one thing and do it right" mentality. Void Linux does not support systemd.

Unlike it's closest competitor, Arch, Void includes a very user-friendly and simple installer in the ISO.

Runit init system is incredibly fast to boot and very simple to use.

Arch Linux doesn't make ISO's with different DE's. One need to manually install it through CLI version. But Void which is competitor of Arch, provides a wide range of DE's ISOs.

Base installation can idle at less than 250 megabytes of RAM.

A brand new package manager that is fast, full-featured, and tailored specifically for Void Linux.

Full support for LibreSSL, an OpenSSL fork focused on maximizing security. The xbps-src package builder works in a similar manner to BSD's ports collection.

Musl libc is lighter and faster than bloated glibc. Musl has been argued to be more secure overall than glibc also but is also not supported by all software.

Unlike the Arch Forum, it is a friendly forum (although small).

Xbps-src is a source packages collection which is pretty similar to FreeBSD's ports and may replace AUR for Void users.

There are some packages in official repos, than may be found only in AUR.

Neofetch looks good.

Uses runit instead of systemd.

Top support for video drivers.

Such as notification pane, weather gadget and a sweet new centered taskbar.

DirectX 12 Ultimate and DirectStorage boost gaming performance quite a bit.

Centered Taskbar and Start Menu, Widgets panel, and so many more new features and UI elements make Windows 11 truly unique compared to other operating systems.