When comparing Google Contacts vs FullContact, the Slant community recommends Google Contacts for most people. In the question“What are the best cross-platform contact management tools?” Google Contacts is ranked 1st while FullContact is ranked 2nd. The most important reason people chose Google Contacts is:
Can automatically find and merge duplicate entries.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Allows dealing with duplicates easily
Can automatically find and merge duplicate entries.
Pro Easily transfers between devices
Contacts can be transferred from different Android phones without fail.
Pro Free
No limitation to use it.
Pro Preinstalled on Android
Most Android devices have Google Contacts installed.
Pro Contacts can be organized via tags
Pro Great integration with Google's services
FullContact pulls information about contacts from social networks to give an overview of the person right from within Gmail. It shows information about meeting attendees in Google Calendar. It supplements Google Contacts by adding additional information to entries.
Pro Helps deal with duplicates across multiple accounts
Including Google, iCloud, Microsoft Exchange, Twitter, Foursquare, Xing and Linkedin accounts.
Pro Keeps information about contacts up to date
Free version synchronizes contact information daily while the premium version allows real-time sync.
Pro Accurate business card transcription
FullContact uses human transcription that allows for near-perfect accuracy.
Pro Seamless translation between carddav (Google, Apple) and .vcf (Outlook)
Apple/Google/Yahoo employ a similar format type of contact card called cardDAV/webDAV while Outlook uses a .vcf format extension.
Anyone who has tried to sync Google to Apple or vice versa knows that despite a similar format, just getting those two to sync well without losing details or mashing up data can be very hard. FullContac seamlessly integrates the address books of all of the major players and does so really well.
Pro Allows adding notes for each contact
Cons
Con Not open source
Con No multiuser support
Con Poor group management
Group lists don't allow you to specify which email to use.
Con All but 1 of the already established PROs are in fact CONs in my estimation...
That's right! We're Everywhere... Convenient, huh?
But, whatever...do what you gonna do. People be peopling. I got some 'pinions 'bout some stuff. Case in point... Decide for yourself. #admittedlystilldegoogling #onfacebooktoo
Con Syncing is still suspect
I have used this app for awhile now and I still am annoyed at the screwing up of syncing across devices.
Con Advanced features require payment
It's subscription-based and there's a monthly cost depending on the feature tier you choose.
Con Deceptive and misleading claims about their offers
