When comparing Zombie.js vs BugBug.io, the Slant community recommends Zombie.js for most people. In the question“What are the best automated browser testing frameworks?” Zombie.js is ranked 10th while BugBug.io is ranked 11th. The most important reason people chose Zombie.js is:
Zombie is built on node.js, making it very easy to integrate with your project and into your testing toolchain. It only requires JavaScript to run.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Runs on Node.js
Zombie is built on node.js, making it very easy to integrate with your project and into your testing toolchain. It only requires JavaScript to run.
Pro Fully featured api based interaction and assertion
The way the api is built makes it very easy to add to your test framework.
Pro Claims to be "Insanely Fast"
It's a lot faster than fully fletched browsers and a lot lighter. Partly because it really only focuses on headless loading of pages along with their JavaScript (not taking really care of rendering or more visual resources).
Pro Reusable components
You are able to group the steps in tests into reusable components to manage and repair them easier. As a bonus, you can see all test flows on a single project graph.
Pro Great UI & UX
A design for a high efficiency
Pro Debuggability
You can run tests and debug directly from a Chrome browser, where you have access to DevTools.
Cons
Con Support has waned
As of August 19, 2016, Zombie hasn't received a commit since January 2016. Issues get comments like "patch welcome".
Con Stale documentation
Full API documentation has been missing since the start, making it frustrating to use.
Con Fails to load many sites
As its JavaScript and DOM engine are mostly "just good enough" and because by design it'll report all errors and stop there, many complex sites will not load properly through Zombie.js.
Con No screen-shot
As it doesn't render the page, you cannot get a screenshot to for testing or reporting test failures.