When comparing Safe In Cloud vs Bitwarden, the Slant community recommends Bitwarden for most people. In the question“What is the best cross-platform password manager?” Bitwarden is ranked 2nd while Safe In Cloud is ranked 7th. The most important reason people chose Bitwarden is:
Bitwarden is open source and can therefore easily be reviewed and checked for security. Its Github repository is accessible [here](https://github.com/bitwarden).
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Clean UI
Clean, intuitive, customizable, easy to use interface. Organization is made easy by being able to select different colors and symbols to label cards with.
Pro Effective encryption
Safe in Cloud uses 256-bit (AES) Advanced Encryption Standard, which is the same as what the federal government uses to secure information.
Pro Can be synced with any major cloud service
In order to sync across devices, Safe in Cloud lets users select their preferred cloud service. The options include Google Drive, Dropbox, Skydrive, and Box.

Pro Supports strong passwords
Safe in Cloud calculates the strength of the password in a very good and clear way. It not only depends on number of Capitals, numbers and special characters. It takes also into account what is found in dictionaries.
Pro Unlimited type of custom fields
You can store all type of fields (text, passwords, URL, data, pin, secret...), even images and files.
Pro Android version with fingerprint login
Faster access to all passwords without the need to enter master passwords every time. Support Samsung Fingerpint (Note 4 tested)
Pro Configurable field and built in field editable
You can add an unlimited number of custom fields. Fields can be reordered, assigned labels and symbols, and have their colors changed.
Safe in Cloud also lets you store a variety of data types.
Pro Encrypted Database backed up in cloud and synchronised across other platforms
Pro Maintains a history of previous passwords
Very useful especially if password has been changed in password app and then the website asks for previous password in order to change it.
Pro Locally stored Database can be set to automatically destruct if incorrect password entered too many times (configurable)
The database will still be safe in the cloud and can easily be restored. An excellent balance between security and usability. Locally stored only apps are more susceptible to DOS Denial of Service attacks.
Pro Web Browser Extension pastes username and password simultaneously
Pro Smartphone App and Desktop App allow offline updates which later sync once connected
Pro Android Chrome Autofill
You can autofill form in Chrome on Android. It's not enabled by default though, it must be enabled in the menu.
Pro Unlimited and free
No monthly pay.
Pro Mac version
Pro Android version with autofill in Chrome
Faster to use passwords in Chrome and to carry it around.
Pro Option to enter just part of password for quick access
Option to enter just part of password for quick access. If this is entered incorrectly then the whole password is needed. This allows one to set a very secure password but will only have to enter a few characters on most occasions.
Pro Imports data from other password managers
Safe in Cloud can import usernames and passwords from virtually every popular password manager.
Pro Web Browser Extension identifies required login required
If URL is present in the data then the username & password are automatically offered for pasting.
Pro Can save an image of an ID Card, passport etc.
Pro Custom unlimited templates
Create templates to faster add special types of data. For example: ftp or ssh keys.
Pro Open source
Bitwarden is open source and can therefore easily be reviewed and checked for security. Its Github repository is accessible here.
Pro Free
It is easy to start as the majority of features are on the free version.
Pro Cross-platform syncronisation
Automatically synchronises across various devices and platforms. Passwords get fully encrypted locally before leaving the computer.
Pro Clean interface with no ads
No ads, no tracking.
Pro Native mobile apps for iOS and Android
Pro Many browser plugins
There are plugins for Firefox, Chrome, Safari, Opera, Edge, Vivaldi and Tor Browser.
Pro Strong, easy to use built-in password genarator
No need to think of individual passwords. This can be easily accomplished with an easy to use built-in password manager.
Pro Extremely strong encryption algorithm
End-to-end AES-256 bit encryption, salted hashing, and PBKDF2 SHA-256.
Pro Two-step authentication
Offers 2FA with Authy, Google Authenticator or via email.
Additionally, the Pro Version has Duo Security with Duo Push, SMS, phone call, and U2F security keys: YubiKey (any 4 series device or YubiKey NEO) and FIDO U2F (any FIDO U2F certified key).
Pro Web vault
Possibility to manage passwords without installing the app or the browser plugin.
Pro Supports multi-logins on one site
You can store multiple logins on the same website.
Pro Multifactor authentication
Pro Secure notes
Very easy to add personal notes.
Pro Command line interface
You could retrieve passwords in the scripts.
Pro Auto-fill remembers last user
When a site has multiple credentials (like I have for some brokers and banks), then the most recently used is automatically populated (if auto-fill is opted). This feature is unique (to my knowledge) and spectacular (especially for sites that log you off frequently and re-logging in is required).
Pro Digital unlock works fairly well
Android app is a little slow and buggy, but it works well and has been improving.
Pro Self-host your own server
Host your own server via Docker for small installations or by package for multiple servers.
Pro Almost complete free version
The features included in the free version are totally sufficient for most personal uses. No limitation of devices synching.
Pro Dark theme
Pro Easy to use
Pro Use hardware based biometrics to unlock Bitwarden
You can use Windows Hello or Apple's TouchID on PC to unlock desktop applications and browser extention.
Pro Nested folders
Folders can be created within folders.
Pro Regular expressions can be used in URIs
It can also be used for sites where the domain changes frequently.
Pro Easy import/export
Just copy CSV text.
Pro Save data on the web
Save data on the web.
Pro Enterprise ready
Using enterprise subscribtions you can share password entries among your colleagues via 'collections' or with other companies that are connected to yours. You decide if it's your personal entry or a companies.
Pro Auto-fill by specifying the form with the selector of css
Auto-fill by specifying the form with the selector of css.
Cons
Con Not open source
Con Not free on mobile
Con No native Linux version avaible
Con Inserting text in text or password fields can be slow
It seems safeincloud processes the text quite extensively while typing.
Con Password generator only uses 8 special characters !@#$%^&*
Whereas a desktop keyboard has 30+ special characters. This greatly reduces the possible passwords that can be generated.
Con Unable to remove duplicates
If you import more than one times, it will store its duplicates and there is no duplicate remover on these apps.
Con Passwords cards can be tricky for newbies
The fields can be difficult to understand for newbies. For example, some login pages can add a field for the password name differently at the same time as the password's field will contain a password. When changing the password, they sometime end corresponding and can give headaches to some users.
Con Cloud-based
You're storing your passwords on servers and you have to trust them.
Con Cannot update data while offline
Requires Internet connection.
Con Saving new credentials isn't as easy as it should be
When registering on a new site, Bitwarden pops up a button to ask if you'd like to save credentials (as most equivalent products do). But the button disappears VERY quickly, so often requires manual entry of passwords
Con Input of new login needs a 'signed-up with e-mail = 'example@wherever.org' functionality
Often sites won't be able to reset your password if the corresponding e-mail used in sign-up is unknown.
Con Lack of communication between instance opened in one session
If you use the client's desktop's app, multiple browsers extensions; they all work almost totally independently. Using more RAM as database is opened each time and asking for login more often. Some other passwords managers use desktop's client to open the database and extensions communicate with it in this case. If there's no desktop's, they'll work as standalone extensions.
Con The autofill sucks
The autofill is tedious - many clicks/taps required to trigger it. It doesn't help that the extension is slow to open.
Con Cannot store images of ID card, etc
Attachments available in premium.
Con Web browser extension doesn't recognise login required
User has to scroll/search for web site login details as it is not found automatically.
Con Doesn't autofill 2FA in pass fields
