When comparing Safe In Cloud vs pass, the Slant community recommends pass for most people. In the question“What is the best cross-platform password manager?” pass is ranked 3rd while Safe In Cloud is ranked 7th. The most important reason people chose pass is:
And is basically just a bunch of GPG-encrypted files stored in a folder.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Clean UI
Clean, intuitive, customizable, easy to use interface. Organization is made easy by being able to select different colors and symbols to label cards with.
Pro Effective encryption
Safe in Cloud uses 256-bit (AES) Advanced Encryption Standard, which is the same as what the federal government uses to secure information.
Pro Can be synced with any major cloud service
In order to sync across devices, Safe in Cloud lets users select their preferred cloud service. The options include Google Drive, Dropbox, Skydrive, and Box.

Pro Supports strong passwords
Safe in Cloud calculates the strength of the password in a very good and clear way. It not only depends on number of Capitals, numbers and special characters. It takes also into account what is found in dictionaries.
Pro Unlimited type of custom fields
You can store all type of fields (text, passwords, URL, data, pin, secret...), even images and files.
Pro Android version with fingerprint login
Faster access to all passwords without the need to enter master passwords every time. Support Samsung Fingerpint (Note 4 tested)
Pro Encrypted Database backed up in cloud and synchronised across other platforms
Pro Smartphone App and Desktop App allow offline updates which later sync once connected
Pro Configurable field and built in field editable
You can add an unlimited number of custom fields. Fields can be reordered, assigned labels and symbols, and have their colors changed.
Safe in Cloud also lets you store a variety of data types.
Pro Android Chrome Autofill
You can autofill form in Chrome on Android. It's not enabled by default though, it must be enabled in the menu.
Pro Unlimited and free
No monthly pay.
Pro Maintains a history of previous passwords
Very useful especially if password has been changed in password app and then the website asks for previous password in order to change it.
Pro Web Browser Extension pastes username and password simultaneously
Pro Mac version
Pro Android version with autofill in Chrome
Faster to use passwords in Chrome and to carry it around.
Pro Option to enter just part of password for quick access
Option to enter just part of password for quick access. If this is entered incorrectly then the whole password is needed. This allows one to set a very secure password but will only have to enter a few characters on most occasions.
Pro Locally stored Database can be set to automatically destruct if incorrect password entered too many times (configurable)
The database will still be safe in the cloud and can easily be restored. An excellent balance between security and usability. Locally stored only apps are more susceptible to DOS Denial of Service attacks.
Pro Imports data from other password managers
Safe in Cloud can import usernames and passwords from virtually every popular password manager.
Pro Web Browser Extension identifies required login required
If URL is present in the data then the username & password are automatically offered for pasting.
Pro Can save an image of an ID Card, passport etc.
Pro Custom unlimited templates
Create templates to faster add special types of data. For example: ftp or ssh keys.

Pro Works in command line
And is basically just a bunch of GPG-encrypted files stored in a folder.

Pro Free and open source

Pro Full control
You are not forced to rely on any other service provider than yourself. Like saving them on a remote server as in the case of LastPass. You don't have to extend your trust (to LastPass or any other provider).

Pro Ultra portable
As it has both Git support and encrypts passwords to GPG-encrypted text files, it is really simple to access everywhere. You can either use a self-hosted or a personal cloud hosted Git repository. It is automatically being kept up-to-date. Clients for pretty much everything and a really active community. Even if you can't run a client you will still be able to access the password by decrypting them from the Git store.
Pro Has cross platform GUI clients
It has a Qt-based GUI, an Android and iOS app, a Firefox plugin, a Golang GUI app, an interactive CUI, a dmenu script, OS X integration, and also an Emacs package.

Pro Not using a database
It doesn't use a database like, for example, KeePass and thus doesn't open all passwords at once. Just one at a time.
Pro Allows storing password history
You can version-control the encrypted files using Git, which allows you to track all changes done.
Pro Adheres to Unix philosophy
Does one thing and does it well.
Pro Uses standard components
As GPG and Git are widely used, it relies on thoroughly tested and secure functionality.
Pro Scripts for importing passwords from different services
Pro Multi user suppport
You and your team can share a repo and different subtrees can be encrypted for different sets of GPG ids.
Pro Support for extra functionality via plugins
For example the plugin "pass-extension-tail" makes it possible to only display the non-password parts of a password file, like the username or the name of the service the password is needed for, and without showing the password.
Pro Minimal
It's very easy to understand what the program does, why it's doing it, and how it's secure.
Pro Has git support
Cons
Con Not Open source
Con No native Linux version avaible
There's no native app for Linux available.
Con Inserting text in text or password fields can be slow
It seems safeincloud processes the text quite extensively while typing.
Con Not super user friendly
Might be a little too low-level (even with GUIs) for some teams of users.
Con Exposes the names of the sites
By default each file is named 'google.com.gpg' - so someone who steals your password directory would know every site you have accounts on.
Can be mitigated with plugins like Tomb, but a noteworthy caveat.
Con Not hosted = not accessible
As everything is stored locally, there's no way to access your passwords while on public computers, etc. without exposing your private key to the world. You'll have to manually enter your passwords while looking at your phone, etc.
Con Not ideal if you have to use Windows
While windows clients technically exist, this program is quite obviously aimed at UNIX-like systems. If you have to use Windows (eg. for work) then it'll be difficult to get everything set up properly.
Con No webapp for easy shared access
