When comparing HP Pavilion 27er vs LG 34WK95U, the Slant community recommends HP Pavilion 27er for most people. In the question“What are the best monitors?” HP Pavilion 27er is ranked 154th while LG 34WK95U is ranked 219th. The most important reason people chose HP Pavilion 27er is:
The HP Pavillion 27er is among the handful of large, 27-inch IPS monitors that cost less than $200. It is tough to find a cheaper 27-inch monitor that would match the exceptional picture quality of the Pavillion 27er.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro High value for the money
The HP Pavillion 27er is among the handful of large, 27-inch IPS monitors that cost less than $200. It is tough to find a cheaper 27-inch monitor that would match the exceptional picture quality of the Pavillion 27er.
Pro Looks good from an angle
The picture quality of the HP Pavillion 27er doesn't degrade when you view the monitor from an angle thanks to its IPS panel.
Pro 5K resolution
The LG 34WK95U is an excellent option for those who aren't satisfied with the current-generation 4K displays thanks to its resolution that measures at 5120x3840 pixels.
Pro Has a USB-C port
The monitor's USB-C port receive a video signal, run the 34WK95U's integrated USB hub, and charge peripherals - all at once. It is fully compatible with the Thunderbolt 3 interface.
Pro Has a USB-C port
The monitor's USB-C port receive a video signal, run the 34WK95U's integrated USB hub, and charge peripherals - all at once. It is fully compatible with the Thunderbolt 3 interface.
Pro Has a USB-C port
The monitor's USB-C port receive a video signal, run the 34WK95U's integrated USB hub, and charge peripherals - all at once. It is fully compatible with the Thunderbolt 3 interface.
Cons
Con Bad for competitive gaming
In its price range, the HP Pavillion 27er doesn't offer the smoothest gaming experience because of its low refresh rate and high input lag.
Con Expensive
There are many equally-sized 4K panels that offer the same functionality as the 34WK95U while costing substantially less.