When comparing LG 32MA70HY-P vs LG 32UD59-B, the Slant community recommends LG 32MA70HY-P for most people. In the question“What are the best monitors?” LG 32MA70HY-P is ranked 149th while LG 32UD59-B is ranked 152nd. The most important reason people chose LG 32MA70HY-P is:
The picture quality of this monitor doesn't degrade noticeably when you view the panel from a side thanks to the monitor's high-quality IPS panel. Though, this is a common property of an IPS monitor.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Looks good from an angle
The picture quality of this monitor doesn't degrade noticeably when you view the panel from a side thanks to the monitor's high-quality IPS panel. Though, this is a common property of an IPS monitor.
Pro Good for multitasking
The LG 32MA70HY-P is a good pick for those who like to work with multiple windows simultaneously because of the sizeable on-screen area it offers. You can easily fit two Word documents stacked side-by-side on its massive 32-inch screen. Apart from the standard tab arrangements that are built into the Windows, you can download LG's Split Screen software that contains additional desktop arrangements.
Pro Adjustable
You'll not have problems fitting this monitor into your desktop environment thanks to the generous range of ergonomic adjustments the 32UD59-B offers. You can adjust monitor's height and tilt angle.
Pro Good for productivity
The LG 32UD59-B is an excellent companion to the fans of multi-tasking thanks to the generous amount of on-screen real estate it has. You can easily fit two Word documents, side by side on its massive, 32-inch 4K screen.
Cons
Con Image looks pixelated
When you view this monitor from up close, you will be able to spot some individual pixels because of the low pixel density of the 32MA70HY-P. Since the monitor's massive 32-inch panel has the resolution of only 1920x1080 pixels, its pixel density measures at the mare 68.84 pixels per inch.
Con Bad for action gaming
The LG 32UD59-B isn't the best option for action gamers because of it's lackluster responsiveness that is caused by the monitor's low native refresh rate and high input lag.
