When comparing LG 32MA70HY-P vs BenQ GW2765HT, the Slant community recommends LG 32MA70HY-P for most people. In the question“What are the best monitors?” LG 32MA70HY-P is ranked 149th while BenQ GW2765HT is ranked 242nd. The most important reason people chose LG 32MA70HY-P is:
The picture quality of this monitor doesn't degrade noticeably when you view the panel from a side thanks to the monitor's high-quality IPS panel. Though, this is a common property of an IPS monitor.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Looks good from an angle
The picture quality of this monitor doesn't degrade noticeably when you view the panel from a side thanks to the monitor's high-quality IPS panel. Though, this is a common property of an IPS monitor.
Pro Good for multitasking
The LG 32MA70HY-P is a good pick for those who like to work with multiple windows simultaneously because of the sizeable on-screen area it offers. You can easily fit two Word documents stacked side-by-side on its massive 32-inch screen. Apart from the standard tab arrangements that are built into the Windows, you can download LG's Split Screen software that contains additional desktop arrangements.
Pro Flicker-free
This monitor will not exhaust your eyes over the long working hours badly because it's backlight doesn't flicker. Backlight flickering is proven to be among the most serious causes of severe eye fatigue.
Pro Doesn't require calibration
The BenQ GW2765HT offers excellent out-of-the-box gamma and color accuracy, which means that you will not have to spend time adjusting its settings.
Cons
Con Image looks pixelated
When you view this monitor from up close, you will be able to spot some individual pixels because of the low pixel density of the 32MA70HY-P. Since the monitor's massive 32-inch panel has the resolution of only 1920x1080 pixels, its pixel density measures at the mare 68.84 pixels per inch.
Con Not good for competitive gaming
Competitive gamers will find the GW27656HT slow and sluggish because of it's high overall input lag and low native refresh rate.