Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing LG 34WK95U vs BenQ GW2765HT, the Slant community recommends LG 34WK95U for most people. In the question“What are the best monitors?” LG 34WK95U is ranked 219th while BenQ GW2765HT is ranked 242nd. The most important reason people chose LG 34WK95U is:
The LG 34WK95U is an excellent option for those who aren't satisfied with the current-generation 4K displays thanks to its resolution that measures at 5120x3840 pixels.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro 5K resolution
The LG 34WK95U is an excellent option for those who aren't satisfied with the current-generation 4K displays thanks to its resolution that measures at 5120x3840 pixels.
Pro Has a USB-C port
The monitor's USB-C port receive a video signal, run the 34WK95U's integrated USB hub, and charge peripherals - all at once. It is fully compatible with the Thunderbolt 3 interface.
Pro Has a USB-C port
The monitor's USB-C port receive a video signal, run the 34WK95U's integrated USB hub, and charge peripherals - all at once. It is fully compatible with the Thunderbolt 3 interface.
Pro Has a USB-C port
The monitor's USB-C port receive a video signal, run the 34WK95U's integrated USB hub, and charge peripherals - all at once. It is fully compatible with the Thunderbolt 3 interface.
Pro Flicker-free
This monitor will not exhaust your eyes over the long working hours badly because it's backlight doesn't flicker. Backlight flickering is proven to be among the most serious causes of severe eye fatigue.
Pro Doesn't require calibration
The BenQ GW2765HT offers excellent out-of-the-box gamma and color accuracy, which means that you will not have to spend time adjusting its settings.
Cons
Con Expensive
There are many equally-sized 4K panels that offer the same functionality as the 34WK95U while costing substantially less.
Con Not good for competitive gaming
Competitive gamers will find the GW27656HT slow and sluggish because of it's high overall input lag and low native refresh rate.
