Passpack vs Bitwarden

After the 100 password threshold is passed, this service costs $1.50 per month for up to 1,000 passwords and 3 users. Plans can be expanded all the way to $40.00 per month with the capability to store 10,000 passwords and share with 1,000 users.

Passpack allows creating passwords for accessing the Passpack Vault that can only be used once. Great for accessing the Vault in public or untrusted places.

Passpack support two-factor authentication via e-mail or Yubikey.

Users are not at risk of having their passwords known by Passpack staff, as user data is encrypted before it reaches their servers.

Passpack is compatible with Chrome, Internet Explorer, Firefox, and Safari.

Passpack caters to teams by allowing them to easily share credentials with each other.

For users who have already stored their username and password information in a spreadsheet, Passpack makes it easy to migrate all of the information at once. Additionally, Passpack lets users export their info as well.

Bitwarden is open source and can therefore easily be reviewed and checked for security. Its Github repository is accessible here: https://github.com/bitwarden

Automatically synchronises across various devices and platforms. Passwords get fully encrypted locally before leaving the computer.

It is easy to start as the majority of features are on the free version.

There are plugins for Firefox, Chrome, Safari, Opera, Edge, Vivaldi and Tor Browser.

End-to-end AES-256 bit encryption, salted hashing, and PBKDF2 SHA-256.

No need to think of individual passwords. This can be easily accomplished with an easy to use built-in password manager.

Offers 2FA with Authy, Google Authenticator or via email.
Additionally, the Pro Version has Duo Security with Duo Push, SMS, phone call, and U2F security keys: YubiKey (any 4 series device or YubiKey NEO) and FIDO U2F (any FIDO U2F certified key).

When a site has multiple credentials (like I have for some brokers and banks), then the most recently used is automatically populated (if auto-fill is opted). This feature is unique (to my knowledge) and spectacular (especially for sites that log you off frequently and re-logging in is required).

Possibility to manage passwords without installing the app or the browser plugin.

You can store multiple logins on the same website.

Host your own server via Docker for small installations or by package for multiple servers.

Android app is a little slow and buggy, but it works well and has been improving.

You could retrieve passwords in the scripts.

just copy csv text