When comparing Clipperz vs GPG encrypted text file, the Slant community recommends GPG encrypted text file for most people. In the question“What are the best offline password managers?” GPG encrypted text file is ranked 15th while Clipperz is ranked 25th. The most important reason people chose GPG encrypted text file is:
For example, I can run GITHUB_TOKEN=$(gpg -d GITHUB_TOKEN.gpg) some_tool
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Disposable one-time pass phrase for use on a public computer
Pro Open source
Clipperz has been around for many years as an open source project.

Pro Completely anonymous
Clipperz does not ask for any personal information, no email required, nothing.
Pro Encryption is client-side
Everything is encrypted in the browser and stored encrypted on the server.
Pro Can be run on own server
Clipperz can be run on a private server.
Pro Download local copy for backup in a pinch
Pro Can be easily integrated with other command-line tools
For example, I can run GITHUB_TOKEN=$(gpg -d GITHUB_TOKEN.gpg) some_tool
Pro Outstanding compatibility
GPG is standard on most operating systems, and is compatible with "too many to list". A GPG API is currently being developed for further integration.
Pro Free to use and modify
GPG does not use patented algorithms, so this service is free to use and modify without restrictions.
Pro Can be used with any system that understands text files
Text files are ubiquitous. They can be read across any modern platform and many obsolete one's.
Pro No dependencies
GnuPG does not depend on a reading program in order to be functional.
Pro Offers an installation package for Windows and OS X
"Gpg4win" is the installation package for Windows, and "GPGTools" is the package for Mac. The purpose of these packages is to equip users with everything needed in order to effectively keep information private.
Pro Uses symmetric key encryption to ensure that emails are secure
Symmetric key encryption not only protects emails from unauthorized access, but it ensures that the sender and receiver are legitimate.
Cons
Con Backups are up to the user
There is no service with this application, it is up to the end user to backup all data.
Con Has to be running on a server to work
Unlike other password managers such as KeePass, Clipperz can not just be simply run by executing once downloaded. It has to be setup to run on a server and then can be accessed from the necessary devices.
Con Requires knowledge of the command line
GnuPG requires technical knowledge, but their FAQ is incredibly helpful for people who want to get started.
