When comparing Monoid vs Input Mono, the Slant community recommends Monoid for most people. In the question“What are the best programming fonts?” Monoid is ranked 25th while Input Mono is ranked 40th. The most important reason people chose Monoid is:
The common expression '!=' is displayed as '≠', '>=' as '≥' *, while maintaining the fixed width double-space that these characters would normally take, so as to maintain text alignment. * Many others are supported too - see site for details.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pro Novel use of ligatures to display ascii character combinations as symbols
The common expression '!=' is displayed as '≠', '>=' as '≥' *, while maintaining the fixed width double-space that these characters would normally take, so as to maintain text alignment.
- Many others are supported too - see site for details.
The user can adjust letter-spacing, line-height, and choose alternate characters prior to downloading.
Pro Open source
Monoid is open source meaning it's freely available to anyone.
Pro Fine without retia
Probably the only one that is.
Pro Larger and easier to read with thin condensed letters
Many letter-forms are available in Input Mono, the width and line-height of which are changeable. There are also non-monospaced sans and sans-serif forms available.
Pro Free for private use
Pro Great on small-sized, high-resolution screens
Input Mono is designed to look good on HiDPI and low-resolution screens of variable zoom levels.
Pro Large punctuation
The punctuation symbols are larger than in other traditional fonts, making for greater visibility.
Pro Non-monospaced sibling fonts
In addition to the monospaced variant, the Input family of fonts includes serif and non-serif proportional font families.
Con No bold-italic style
Monoid doesn't offer a style that is both bold and italic.