Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing nuclio vs Google Cloud Functions, the Slant community recommends Google Cloud Functions for most people. In the question“What are the best serverless frameworks?” Google Cloud Functions is ranked 3rd while nuclio is ranked 8th. The most important reason people chose Google Cloud Functions is:
Cloud Functions, as of this writing, supports JavaScript, Python, Go and Java.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Fast
Most of Nuclio is written in Go.
Pro Multiple platforms
Supports Docker, Google Container Engine, Azure Container Service and Kubernetes.
Pro Multiple languages
Examples available for Go, Python, NodeJS, .NET Core and Java.
Pro Supports multiple languages
Cloud Functions, as of this writing, supports JavaScript, Python, Go and Java.
Pro Supports multiple sources of events
Cloud Functions can be triggered from PubSub and from HTTP events, for example.
Pro Frictionless to create
There is an inline editor in Google Cloud for writing and submitting/deploying cloud functions, so while it is possible to store a Cloud function as code in a repository you can try and experiment without getting to that point.
Cons
Con Limited languages and dependencies
Only the set of languages explicitly supported by Cloud Functions can be used; for more flexibility, I would highly recommend Google's other serverless environment, namely Cloud Run.
