When comparing Gitolite vs sourcehut, the Slant community recommends Gitolite for most people. In the question“What are the best self-hosted web-based Git repository managers?” Gitolite is ranked 15th while sourcehut is ranked 20th. The most important reason people chose Gitolite is:
The project itself already has a long history behind it, and many use it. It is highly customizable and has a very navigable and intuitive interface. In fact, Linux kernel project has been using it for a very long time.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Highly customizable, and a very intuitive interface
The project itself already has a long history behind it, and many use it. It is highly customizable and has a very navigable and intuitive interface. In fact, Linux kernel project has been using it for a very long time.
Pro Lightweight
No javascript, drasticly light interface
Pro Email-Based Communication and Coordination
Unlike other services that make their communication services like mainstream social media, Sourcehut uses good old mailing lists to make things simpler. It capitalizes on git's "git send-email" feature. This is in adherence to Sourcehut's general design, which is to make simple, reliable products. The official website is at https://lists.sr.ht, and they have a tutorial on setting your git client up at https://git-send-email.io
Pro Includes build service
Sourcehut has an automated build service at https://builds.sr.ht that can build your code from it's repository. Because the project is in alpha, this service is currently free (they will build your projects for you for free!)
Pro "Pro" features are free since the project is still in Alpha
Because the project is in alpha, the "pro" features are free.
Cons
Con May be too complicated for some to set up
You need a little *nix admin experience though it's not an absolute requirement to set this up. The documentation also assumes a similar level.