When comparing CatchJS vs Atatus, the Slant community recommends Atatus for most people. In the question“What are the best JavaScript client-side error logging services?” Atatus is ranked 11th while CatchJS is ranked 14th. The most important reason people chose Atatus is:
Atatus will break down the specific user actions that lead to an error, so you can see what they did before the error occurred. For example, you could see what they typed into a form, and what they clicked on that lead to the error.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Notifications when things break
Can send emails when new errors happen.
Pro Shows code snippets
Shows code snippets of the error and applies source maps automatically.
Pro Doesn't slow down page loads
Has a very small filesize, so it doesn't slow down page loads.
Pro Screenshots really help debugging
It takes a screenshot of the screen, so you can see what the user was looking at when the error happened.
Pro Timeline feature breaks down user actions so you can better reproduce the issue
Atatus will break down the specific user actions that lead to an error, so you can see what they did before the error occurred. For example, you could see what they typed into a form, and what they clicked on that lead to the error.
Pro Monitors AJAX requests
Pro Monitors page load performance
Pro Easy integration with segment
Atatus has an integration with the segment setup api that allows you to set it up without having to find and paste keys.