Here’s the Deal

Crystal vs twinBASIC

51 36

74 0

When comparing Crystal vs twinBASIC, the Slant community recommends twinBASIC for most people. In the question“What are the best compiled programming languages?” twinBASIC is ranked 12th while Crystal is ranked 13th. The most important reason people chose twinBASIC is:

Any code that runs in VB6 will run in twinBASIC (once v1 is released). Code that runs in VBA will also run in twinBASIC, though you need to account for any dependencies on the host application's object model (e.g., the Excel or Access Application object).

Specs

PlatformsLinux, BSD, OSX

Crystal Language Reviewhttps://ossinsight.io/analyze/crystal-lang/crystal#overview

DeveloperAry Borenszweig, Juan Wajnerman, Brian Cardiff

LicenseApache v2

Websitehttps://crystal-lang.org/

PlatformsWindows, Linux, Mac, Android

Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking

Common Questions

What are the best compiled programming languages?

Pros

Pro
Elegant syntax as Ruby

Pro
Fast performance

Pro
Has co-routine

Pro
Compiles to native binary

Pro
100% Backward Compatible with VB6/VBA

Pro
No runtime requirement

The lack of a runtime dependency makes twinBASIC applications very lightweight and portable. Additionally, compiled executables only include necessary code from any referenced libraries. The classic "Hello, World" program compiles down to an 8 KB .exe with no external dependencies.

Pro
Compile DLLs to extend VBA functionality

Can be used to extend VBA functionality by compiling standard and ActiveX DLLs in both 32 and 64bit.

Pro
64bit compilation is supported

64bit compilation is supported, as well as 32bit.

Pro
At last! a replacement for VB6

At last there is a replacement for Microsoft VB6 - and for VBA too - twinBASIC programming.

Ad
Cons

Con
Aruguably no better than a meme language

The elitest attitudes in the community are unwarrented. Not recommendable for production use. Poor error messages, odd compiler errors, poorly documented behavior, etc..