When comparing Sollar PuTTY vs mRemoteNG, the Slant community recommends mRemoteNG for most people. In the question“What are the best SSH clients for Windows?” mRemoteNG is ranked 19th while Sollar PuTTY is ranked 20th. The most important reason people chose mRemoteNG is:
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pro Color coded host
Host connections can be assigned a color, so you quickly discern them in the host list and in the connection tabs.
Pro Allows storage of login credentials
Sollar Putty creates an encrypted local file where you can store the login details for your devices.
Pro Provides significant expansion of PuTTY capabilities for free
In additional to regular PuTTY features you get multi-tab interface, auto-login, quick access to recent sessions, integration of Windows Search, and other useful features.
Pro It's free
Pro Import/Export feature
Allows to share connections.
Pro Connection manager
Lets you organize your connections into folders with icons as well and allows nested folders as well.
Pro Can open multiple sessions in different tabs
Pro Supports multiple protocols
RDP (Remote Desktop/Terminal Server)
VNC (Virtual Network Computing)
ICA (Citrix Independent Computing Architecture)
SSH (Secure Shell)
Telnet (TELecommunication NETwork)
HTTP/HTTPS (Hypertext Transfer Protocol)
Raw Socket Connections
Pro Inheritance from folder properties
Inheritance makes it possible to store properties on folder basis and let the underlying connections inherit this info.
Con No public download
They require your personal data and a working email before you can get the program. Not a great way to spread your allegedly "free" tool.
Con X11 not supported
Con Has ads
Con No option for translucent windows
Con Private keys needs to be managed on PuTTY
Since mRemoteNG is integrated with PuTTY (included in the installation), all private key needs to be configured on PuTTY itself and then the PuTTY session needs to be selected on mRemoteNG.