When comparing Luakit vs Qutebrowser, the Slant community recommends Qutebrowser for most people. In the question“What are the best web browsers for UNIX-like systems?” Qutebrowser is ranked 13th while Luakit is ranked 32nd. The most important reason people chose Qutebrowser is:
With suggestions/auto-complete to reduce the learning curve.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Fast and lightweight
A browser based on webkit, and uses vim keybinds.
Pro Highly-configurable
Pro Vim-style keyboard shortcuts and commands for rapid navigation
With suggestions/auto-complete to reduce the learning curve.
Pro Fast and light on resource usage
Pro Highly customizable
And quite easy to configure. You can even write your own config.
Pro Great for Privacy
Makes no unexpected network requests by default, unlike most other browsers (Chrome, Chromium, Brave, Firefox, etc).
Pro Userscripts
Call custom scripts on web pages or links (hinting mode).
You can use this for downloading of videos (youtube-dl, adfree), saving web pages as pdf or adding news sources to your RSS reader (newsboat).
Cons
Con Only white screens for viewing
Only white screens for viewing and a dark side bar, which should be the the other way around, since we don't spend most of our time looking a the side bar, to begin with!
Con Software rendering only with Nouveau Drivers
Con Steep learning curve
If you're not a vim user, it will take some time to get used to the shortcuts.
Con Slow
As it is mainly written in Python, it's startup is slower than the competition.