When comparing ElasticHQ vs elasticsearch-admin, the Slant community recommends ElasticHQ for most people. In the question“What are the best Elasticsearch GUI clients?” ElasticHQ is ranked 3rd while elasticsearch-admin is ranked 11th. The most important reason people chose ElasticHQ is:
ElasticHQ is easy to install and accessible from your browser. Can be installed in just 2 commands and will remain running until shutdown. Installation docs can be found [here.](https://github.com/ElasticHQ/elasticsearch-HQ)
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pro Installation is easy
ElasticHQ is easy to install and accessible from your browser. Can be installed in just 2 commands and will remain running until shutdown. Installation docs can be found here.
Pro Most comprehensive set of tools
Can manage and keep track of ES Datasets in real time, is cloud-ready and has been battle-tested by multiple large companies.
Pro Real-Time Monitoring
ElasticHQ allows you to view real-time threads, individual cluster nodes, cluster runtime metrics, and configurations.
Pro Cloud ready
Can be deployed on AWS, Azure and any other cloud service.
Pro Open source
Licensed under Apache 2 can be used and re-distributed without complications.
Pro Cluster management
Complete control over clusters, nodes, indexes, and mappings.
Pro Internal users with roles and permissions
All pages and actions defined with a permission
Pro Access the latest ES features
Dangling indices [7.9]
Composable index templates [7.8]
Component templates [7.8]
Enrich policies [7.5]
Snapshot lifecycle management policies [7.4]
Pro Cluster audit
See pass/fail for checkpoints regarding the cluster
Pro Export documents as CSV, TSV, ODS, XLSX, GEOJSON
Pro Import from file (ODS, XLSX) or from database (MySQL, PostgreSQL)
Pro Source installation or Docker image
Install manually on a web server with PHP or run a container with the Docker image
Con Error when using SSL and Python 3.6+
This bug is under investigation but is not close to being solved. See here.