When comparing Miso vs Scotty, the Slant community recommends Scotty for most people. In the question“What are the best Haskell web frameworks for building RESTful web services?” Scotty is ranked 5th while Miso is ranked 12th. The most important reason people chose Scotty is:
A simple framework cuts development time and costs. To get started, developers only need to understand how to write routing and actions.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Fast
Pro Easy
Pro Isomorphic
Pro Virtual DOM
Pro Type-sharing
Pro Type-safe routing
Pro Easy to pick up and use
A simple framework cuts development time and costs. To get started, developers only need to understand how to write routing and actions.
Pro Available on gitHub
Having the source code on gitHub means developers can easily suggest improvements and error reports. They also have a community that can help with any problems that come up.
Cons
Con Bloated
Requires nix, ghcjs, and a lot of other sources of significant technical debt to the project.
Con Lacks features due to its small size
Since Scotty is small, it does not contain some features that a complex web application may need. Anything that Scotty can't provide must be either found or written, costing developers.