JQuery vs Move.js Ok
When comparing JQuery vs Move.js Ok, the Slant community recommends JQuery for most people. In the question“What are the best JavaScript animation frameworks or libraries?” JQuery is ranked 6th while Move.js Ok is ranked 7th. The most important reason people chose JQuery is:
Much easier to use than traditional JavaScript. Allows a lot of features and function to be completed with less lines of code.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Easy to use
Much easier to use than traditional JavaScript. Allows a lot of features and function to be completed with less lines of code.
Pro Cross-browser support
jQuery works on all modern browsers, although there may be some issues with old versions of each browser.
Pro Strong community
The open source community has really embraced jQuery and it has many readily available plugins to help speed up the development process. In addition to this, it has great documentation and tutorials
Pro Simple to use
Move.js is just a simple JS layer on top of CSS3 animations. It's pretty easy to use because it just exposes an API with which you can use CSS selectors and props to animate objects.
Pro Lightweight
Move.js is extremely small and lightweight (only 13KB) JavaScript library.
Cons
Con It is not a framework, but rather a library.
Frameworks allow you to handle page routing, authentication, and services. jQuery is not a framework, but rather a library of DOM tools for websites.
e.g.: You cannot write page routing logic within jQuery.
Con Script download
As opposed to just using raw JavaScript, users will (automatically) download the jQuery script to their local computers in order for it to work. This results in more overhead on the initial page visit, regardless of how lightweight the framework is.
Con Seems dead
Latest commit is dated November 30 2015. The last pull request that was closed is dated September 25 2015.