When comparing FLTK vs Sciter, the Slant community recommends FLTK for most people. In the question“What are the best cross-platform GUI toolkits?” FLTK is ranked 12th while Sciter is ranked 19th. The most important reason people chose FLTK is:
It's simple design and lack of more advanced C++ features makes it easy for beginners.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Simplicity
It's simple design and lack of more advanced C++ features makes it easy for beginners.
Pro Fast
Well-designed widgets, coded with careful attention to rendering/execution speed.
Pro Stable
FLTK code developed more than 10 years ago still compiles and runs perfectly, without changes.
Pro Lightweight
Uses a limited and lightweight design and restricts itself to solely GUI functionality. Because of this restriction, the FLTK hello world example is only about 100 KiB.
Pro GUI designer
Fast Light User-Interface Designer (FLUID) included.
Pro Multi language
Support for C++, C#, Delphi, D, Go, Rust, Powerbuilder. See Go bindings on GitHub. The binding for C# on GitHub, SciterSharp does not seem to be free: in a commercial product you should acquire a commercial license.
Pro Lightweight
Only a single native DLL.
Cons
Con Can be too simple for some projects
FLTK offers far fewer widgets than most other toolkits.
Con Does not look like a native application
Because it uses non-native widgets, it doesn't look like a native application on any platform.
Con Linux version is not very mature
The Linux version is missing HTML/CSS features when compared to the Windows version.
Con Not fully HTML5 compliant
Lacking HTML5 functionality and W3C standards: grabbing a library like JQuery or Bootstrap and use it in Sciter will not work.
Con Not WYSIWYG
Not WYSIWYG like WebForms or WPF.
