Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing NANO vs Enhancer for YouTube™, the Slant community recommends Enhancer for YouTube™ for most people. In the question“What are the best Chrome add-ons?” Enhancer for YouTube™ is ranked 36th while NANO is ranked 60th. The most important reason people chose Enhancer for YouTube™ is:
With this feature you can read the entire page without ever losing sight of the video.
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Feeless
Due to NANO's structure it requires 0 fees.
Pro Instant transactions
Instantaneous transactions. The fastest cryptocurrency in activity now.
Pro Does not require mining
Does not require mining
Pro Decentralized
NANO is provably decentralized.
Pro Best cryptocurrency for daily use
With instant, feeless and decentralized transactions, Nano is the most ethical and the best cryptocurrency for daily use.
Pro Deflationary
Forever limited number of Nanos .
Pro Very secure
In theory, in order to send a transaction you just need to notify the receiving wallet, making it fully P2P (Peer-to-Peer).
Pro Embeddable
Nano is easy to integrate with other platforms.
Pro Green
Nano is hypereefficient. The entire network could run on the output of a single wind turbine
Pro Great community
Pro Fairly distributed
Pro Inclusive, classless
Pro Great for developers
Nano is very easy to develop with. There also exist many libraries for a wide variety of programming languages.
Pro Easy to use
Easy to use. What bitcoin was meant to be.
Pro Easy adoption to every day business
Pro Not traceable because of speed
Nano is so fast that can't be tracked by anyone.
Pro SoV
It has 0 supply emission
Pro Pins the video to a corner of the screen if you scroll down
With this feature you can read the entire page without ever losing sight of the video.
Pro Control the volume with the mouse wheel anytime the cursor is over the player
This is especially handy in videos where there's a lot of dynamic in volume levels, unlike the slider at the bottom you can raise or lower it almost before you're finished forming the thought to do so. It also allows you to set a default start volume for all videos instead of the usual 100%.
Pro Specify your preferred resolutions
Ever had a network-heavy process running while watching YouTube and had the site start loading videos at a grainy resolution instead of taking an extra few seconds to buffer adequately at a higher one? Not anymore with this extension! You can set up to four resolutions in order of preference and it will ensure that if any are available for that video it will use them rather than adapt.
Cons
Con Traceable transactions
Not anonymous, but there is discussion to change this.
Con Lower/slow adoption
Perfect for peer to peer but lot of work to do to get business on board.
Con Strongly opposed by Bitcoin maximalists because it threatens Bitcoins existence
As an example, the censoring by moderators of the biggest cryptocurrency forum on Reddit /r/cryptocurrency.
Con Prone to hoarding
Many people might want to hold nano longer term as demand grows and supply is limited. However fortunately there are no direct financial rewards for holding nano as opposed to proof of stake currencies.
Con Lesser known compared to other alternatives - it doesn't have much presence outside of the crypto space
The Nano Foundation doesn't have a massive marketing budget. Nano does only one thing, and that one thing directly competes with Bitcoin. In the short term it's going to be very difficult for Nano.
