When comparing Sciter vs Neutralinojs, the Slant community recommends Sciter for most people. In the question“What are the best lightweight alternatives to Electron.js?” Sciter is ranked 1st while Neutralinojs is ranked 4th. The most important reason people chose Sciter is:
Support for C++, C#, Delphi, D, Go, Rust, Powerbuilder. See [Go bindings on GitHub](https://github.com/sciter-sdk/go-sciter). The binding for C# on GitHub, [SciterSharp](https://github.com/ramon-mendes/SciterSharp) does not seem to be free: in a commercial product you should acquire a commercial license.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Multi language
Support for C++, C#, Delphi, D, Go, Rust, Powerbuilder. See Go bindings on GitHub. The binding for C# on GitHub, SciterSharp does not seem to be free: in a commercial product you should acquire a commercial license.
Pro Lightweight
Only a single native DLL.
Pro Size
Only 1 MB compressed size and 5 MB uncompressed size.
Cons
Con Linux version is not very mature
The Linux version is missing HTML/CSS features when compared to the Windows version.
Con Not fully HTML5 compliant
Lacking HTML5 functionality and W3C standards: grabbing a library like JQuery or Bootstrap and use it in Sciter will not work.
Con Not WYSIWYG
Not WYSIWYG like WebForms or WPF.
Con It might not be ready for production
If we have a look at the github repo issues, there are some serious issues that our production app must not have. I believe Neutralinojs is going to be better in the future. So maybe we can just test apps for now.
Con Reducing size wouldn't really be matter in high-end pc specs
In the practical case, there are not much chance to build memory size or space size sensitive application. The size is just reduced by using webview and adding minimum lib/framework/sdk. Which means some features, we need to manually add them as a developer.
Still Neutralinojs is amazing work.
Con You cannot build Windows x86 (32bit)
Con Windows build seems like to be UWP
