Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing SonarCloud vs Code Climate, the Slant community recommends Code Climate for most people. In the question“What are the best code coverage services?” Code Climate is ranked 4th while SonarCloud is ranked 6th. The most important reason people chose Code Climate is:
Code Climate gives you suggestions on how to improve the code which you can catalog on Jira.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Multi language
Support for more than 20 programming languages.
Pro Branch analysis
SonarCloud features automatic analysis of project branches and pull requests as soon as they get created.
Pro Gives code improvement suggestions
Code Climate gives you suggestions on how to improve the code which you can catalog on Jira.
Pro Integration with team chat software
Code Climate directly integrates with team chat tools like Slack or HipChat.
Pro Shows test code coverage
Code Climate is fully integrated with test coverage statistics and metrics, giving you a complete view and understanding of them.
Pro Free for open source
Code Climate is completely free for open source projects.
Cons
Con Seems extremely Java-focused, despite advertising support for many languages
Con Setup instructions don't work
Con Mostly for web development languages
Code Climate only supports web development projects at the moment. Or at least languages that are widely used in web development (JavaScript, Ruby, Python and PHP). It has no support for largely used languages like Java or C++.
Con Repository token must be set manually for open source projects
The other services tend to automatically integrate with CI services like Travis, but Code Climate requires you to copy your repo's token into your CI service's environment.
Con Web interface doesn't show hits per line
Most code coverage services show both what lines of code were run and how many times each line was run, but Code Climate only shows the former.
