Here’s the Deal
Slant is powered by a community that helps you make informed decisions. Tell us what you’re passionate about to get your personalized feed and help others.
When comparing brow.sh vs Falkon, the Slant community recommends Falkon for most people. In the question“What are the best privacy oriented web browsers?” Falkon is ranked 5th while brow.sh is ranked 14th.
Specs
No specs yet!
Based OnQupZilla
Browser EngineQt WebEngine (Blink)
Default Search EngineDuckDuckGo
LicenseOpenSource (GPLv3)
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Common Questions
Other Questions
Pros
Pro Works on all sites that Firefox works on
Pro Supports JavaScript
Pro Developed by KDE
Pro Lightweight
Pro Free and Open Source
GPLv3 license.
Cons
Con Does not save bandwidth
Does not save bandwidth when run on local machine, only on remote machine without bandwidth limit.
Con Very slow
Con Weak multimedia support
It has some issues with multimedia content eg. Non-playing videos on webpages.
Con Now under the KDE umbrella
Qupzilla is now discontinued and renamed to Falkon. It will also now be a part of KDE and will probably need more dependencies like kde-frameworks in the future.
Con Linux-only
Con Bookmark management not the strongest part
It often requires quite a lot of clicks to add and remove bookmarks.