Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing feren OS vs Garuda Linux, the Slant community recommends Garuda Linux for most people. In the question“What are the best Linux distributions for desktops?” Garuda Linux is ranked 26th while feren OS is ranked 40th. The most important reason people chose Garuda Linux is:
Uses vram, and a zen kernel.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Post installazione
Nel post installazione si apre la finestra che ti permette di scegliere, in tutta semplicità, impostazioni desktop. Bello per un utente desktop che non vuole perdersi nella miriade di opzioni kde
Pro Stabile
Basata su Mint... la stabilità è assicurata!
Pro Bella
Bella da vedere. Permette di lavorare e rilassarsi con semplicità. L’attenzione ai dettagli grafici rende il lavoro più piacevole
Pro Scelta kernel
Feren semplifica la scelta del kernel tramite un’apposita sezione.
Pro Hardware
Installare hardware è semplificato tramite l’interfaccia di Feren
Pro Super-fast
Uses vram, and a zen kernel.
Pro Themes
The dr460nized KDE theme is awesome.
Pro Easy entrance to Arch Linux
Filled to the brim with lots of quality-of-life changes and optimizations that are simple enough for long-time Windows, long-time Mac users, and Arch newbies to understand. Though, it also leads to bloat or not necessarily helpful extra software. If you're not into the "bloat" added in, try checking out the barebones version, you'll need to know a lot of things bout Arch to fully use barebones.
Pro Highly customized interface
You already have most of the customization done for you out of the box.
Pro Unused RAM is wasted RAM
It takes just a bit more RAM than Manjaro. Edit: This statement is only true if it helps the user and since this could be running on a low end machine this will not.
Cons
Con ...
Con Needs a lot of RAM
Minimum is 4GB, for most Linux distributions it's 2GB or less.
Con Super
