When comparing Forkle vs Qutebrowser, the Slant community recommends Qutebrowser for most people. In the question“What are the best lightweight web browsers?” Qutebrowser is ranked 2nd while Forkle is ranked 19th. The most important reason people chose Qutebrowser is:
With suggestions/auto-complete to reduce the learning curve.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Extremely lightweight
Pro Integrated ad blocker
Pro Instant startup
Pro Extremely small download
< 0.5MB
Pro Portable
Pro Built-in adblocker
Pro Vim-style keyboard shortcuts and commands for rapid navigation
With suggestions/auto-complete to reduce the learning curve.
Pro Fast and light on resource usage
Pro Highly customizable
And quite easy to configure. You can even write your own config.
Pro Great for Privacy
Makes no unexpected network requests by default, unlike most other browsers (Chrome, Chromium, Brave, Firefox, etc).
Pro Userscripts
Call custom scripts on web pages or links (hinting mode).
You can use this for downloading of videos (youtube-dl, adfree), saving web pages as pdf or adding news sources to your RSS reader (newsboat).
Cons
Con Does not support tabbed browsing
Con No Linux Install
Con 64-bit only
Con Too minimalist
Con Still in Beta
Con Software rendering only with Nouveau Drivers
Con Steep learning curve
If you're not a vim user, it will take some time to get used to the shortcuts.
Con Slow
As it is mainly written in Python, it's startup is slower than the competition.