fasty vs Appernetic
When comparing fasty vs Appernetic, the Slant community recommends Appernetic for most people. In the question“What is the fastest CMS for web content (news website with some static pages) ?” Appernetic is ranked 12th while fasty is ranked 15th. The most important reason people chose Appernetic is:
Non-developers can easily write and update content using the inline PageDown editor.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro It's flexible
You can add partials and link a partial to a specific dataset (e.g. an AQL request) so creating dynamic content is easy.
Pro Workflow
Work on a staging website and deploy on production (1 click)
Pro Blazing fast
it has a built-in cache.
Pro API Builder
You can manage your API directly within the admin UI. No need to deploy ... You just need to click on the publish button
Pro PageDown editor with image upload
Non-developers can easily write and update content using the inline PageDown editor.
Pro Integrated git flow
Git and GitHub is used for version control, cloning, publishing and syncing of your Appernetic Hugo project. No need to manually enter git commands.
Pro Fast set-up
A Hugo site is configured with git, a file structure and a theme in 2 min instead of 30 min.
Pro Integrated Cloudinary image management
You automatically get a cloudinary link when you upload an image.
Pro Developers have complete control over the source code
Cons
Con young project
the doc, the website is still not ready
Con It need Docker
If you know how to use docker it's very easy ... if not, it can be complicated.