When comparing TuneBrowser vs Audacious, the Slant community recommends Audacious for most people. In the question“What are the best audio players for Windows?” Audacious is ranked 20th while TuneBrowser is ranked 29th. The most important reason people chose Audacious is:
Audacious is a classic music player at heart that has not felt the need to weigh itself down with an assortment of unnecessary options. Advanced functionality can be attained through plugins available from within the program.
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Really modern, sharp UI
Pro Professional, fast, high quality, nice UI
Very nice and professional function for Hi-Res music and devices. It supports playing DSD and almost all kind of music media files, and it also supports ASIO and WASAPI devices and it has very detail to do those settings. Not to mention, it has really professional and clean looking UI design for lots of information like audio streaming, sampling frequency, playback mode...etc.
Pro Streamlined player not weighed down by unnecessary options
Audacious is a classic music player at heart that has not felt the need to weigh itself down with an assortment of unnecessary options. Advanced functionality can be attained through plugins available from within the program.
Pro Tons of plugins
Pro Lightweight
My audacious uses only 18.5 MB of RAM. It has a Winamp visualization style that's very minimized and convenient.
Pro Support for Winamp themes
Audacious can switch from its GTK interface to one that matches the looks of the famous Winamp player. What's even better is that this interface supports any Winamp themes, which allows for more options.
Pro Folder oriented player, but able to play any music container and highly configurable
Lets you play, delete and even change metadata of your music files.
Pro The easiest player for multiple types of files
It plays dts, aac multichannel, etc.
Pro Compatibility with most media formats
It's able to reproduce most of media formats without external plugins.
Cons
Con Full version is a bit pricey (£25.99) for an app that is still in development
Con No manual sorting fields
There is no option to add one's own categories to the sorting fields.
Con Updates are not very frequent
Con No bit perfect output past 24bit
Audiophiles require this, and while most users might not notice a difference, audiophiles will appreciate the improved audio quality.
Con Buggy
For example when using Visual Studio Code and Audacious you get flicked out to the gnome login screen.