When comparing Microsoft Cascadia Code vs Google Noto Sans Mono, the Slant community recommends Microsoft Cascadia Code for most people. In the question“What are the best programming fonts?” Microsoft Cascadia Code is ranked 33rd while Google Noto Sans Mono is ranked 102nd. The most important reason people chose Microsoft Cascadia Code is:
Distinct characters
Specs
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Easy to read
Distinct characters
Pro Ligatures
Pro Default in Windows Terminal
Pro Excellent support for Unicode characters
Unicode uses 16 bits per character, meaning that it can represent more than 65,000 unique characters.
Cons
Con Lacks == ligature
Con Designed specifically for terminals
Not necessarily as good for programming (the question is about programming in particular).
Con Zero is difficult to identify
As it's not dotted or slashed, "0" is more difficult to distinguish.
Con Non-monospace ligature replacements for 'fl', 'fi', 'ffl', 'ffi'
By default, the substrings 'fl', 'fi', 'ffl', and 'ffi' are each crammed into one character width, making it not a truly monospace font. For example, the word 'flag' is rendered as three characters wide.
Con Letters capital 'i' and lowercase 'L' are too similar
The only difference is almost unnoticable.
Con Difficult to distinguish between a period and acomma as well as a colon and a semi-colon
Comma has very small tail, making it difficult to distinguish from a period (full stop). Same applies to colon and semi-colon.