When comparing Simplified BSD License vs Artistic License 1.0, the Slant community recommends Simplified BSD License for most people. In the question“What are the best open-source licenses?” Simplified BSD License is ranked 6th while Artistic License 1.0 is ranked 14th. The most important reason people chose Simplified BSD License is:
BSD licensed software can be used with proprietary software.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Can be used with proprietary software
BSD licensed software can be used with proprietary software.
Pro Short and simple text
This license has one requirement with 2 clauses, both of whcih are related to the distribution of the license itself.
Pro Protects the author
The author of the software avoids any risk for how the software may be used by others.
Pro Prevents lock-in
The license basically allows anyone to do whatever they want with the code as long as the original copyright and license notice is included along with the copy of the code. The code can be used for commercially, it can be modified and it can be distributed.
Pro Protects the author
The author of the software avoids any risk for how the software may be used by others.
Pro Powerful and Strong
It requires change of files, so if you are making a copy of any software licensed with this license, you will have to PROVE that it is not the original software under another name. You are permitted to use the Standard Version and create and use Modified Versions for any purpose without restriction, provided that you do not Distribute the Modified Version.
Cons
Con Nothing prevents someone else from making money off of your software
The 2-clause BSD license is permissive enough that anyone can take your code, rebrand it and sell it.