When comparing Creative Commons vs Artistic License 1.0, the Slant community recommends Creative Commons for most people. In the question“What are the best open-source licenses?” Creative Commons is ranked 5th while Artistic License 1.0 is ranked 14th. The most important reason people chose Creative Commons is:
The Creative Commons has an easy-to-understand utility for choosing which style of the Creative Commons you want to use.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Easy to use licensing decision tool helps customizing the license type
The Creative Commons has an easy-to-understand utility for choosing which style of the Creative Commons you want to use.
Pro Can restrict commercialization
A popular optional clause to the creative commons is the "Attribution-NonCommercial" clause, which restricts work to non-commercial use.
Pro Protects the author
The author of the software avoids any risk for how the software may be used by others.
Pro Powerful and Strong
It requires change of files, so if you are making a copy of any software licensed with this license, you will have to PROVE that it is not the original software under another name. You are permitted to use the Standard Version and create and use Modified Versions for any purpose without restriction, provided that you do not Distribute the Modified Version.
Cons
Con Can restrict commercialization
Con Not recommended for software
Creative Commons does not recommend using CC licenses for software.