When comparing ElasticSearch vs Searx, the Slant community recommends ElasticSearch for most people. In the question“What are the best self-hosted search engines?” ElasticSearch is ranked 3rd while Searx is ranked 5th. The most important reason people chose ElasticSearch is:
Elasticsearch gained its popularity amongst developers by being enjoyable to use. A simple feature comparison against it's competition doesn't convey the significant advantages of just how easy it is to work with. This is due to multiple design choices such as the use of JSON for the API and queries.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Easy to work with
Elasticsearch gained its popularity amongst developers by being enjoyable to use. A simple feature comparison against it's competition doesn't convey the significant advantages of just how easy it is to work with. This is due to multiple design choices such as the use of JSON for the API and queries.
Pro Structured search queries with JSON
Search can be executed either using a simple, Lucene-based query string or using an extensive JSON-based search query DSL. By structuring the query as a JSON object you can be very explicit and can dictate exactly what ElasticSeach will return. A very basic example of a JSON query is:
curl -XGET 'http://localhost:9200/blog/_search?pretty=true' -d '
{
"query" : {
"range" : {
"postDate" : { "from" : "2011-12-10", "to" : "2011-12-12" }
}
}
}'
Pro Aggregations
Another area where ElasticSearch shines is its aggregations features. Similarly to facets (now deprecated), aggregations allow calculating and summarizing data of a query as it happens. Aggregations brings the ability to be nested and is broadly categorized as metrics aggregations and bucket aggregations.
"aggregations" : {
"<aggregation_name>" : {
"<aggregation_type>" : {
<aggregation_body>
},
["aggregations" : { [<sub_aggregation>]* } ]
}
[,"<aggregation_name_2>" : { ... } ]*
}
Pro Pluggable Field Types
Pro Open source
It's free and Open Source so you can host it yourself for free or even tweak it.
Pro Designed to be distributed
The one area where Elasticsearch shines is distributed search. It was built from the ground up to be suitable for high-scale 'cloud' applications.
There are many features Elasticsearch has as a result of being designed to be distributed that aren't currently available in Solr, such as:
- Shards and replicas can to moved to any node in the cluster on demand.
- With a simple API call you can increase and decrease the number of replicas without the need of shutting down nodes or creating new nodes.
- Manipulate shard placement with the cluster reroute API on a live cluster.
- Search across multiple indexes.
- Change the schema without restarting the server.
- Automatic shard rebalancing
Elasticsearch also has a module called Gateway, that in the case of the whole cluster crashing or being taken down will enable you to easily restore the latest state of the cluster when it gets back up.
Services such as Bonsai further simplify scaling Elasticsearch by hosting and scaling the search servers for you, making it nearly as easy to get started as CloudSearch or Searchify. Elasticsearch was also specifically designed to run well and be relatively easy to setup on EC2.
Pro RESTful JSON API for configuration/management
Elasticsearch has a REST API for management and configuration. The following are the main features of this API:
Index Management:
- Create, delete, close and open indices by running a simple HTTP command.
- Increase and decrease the number of replicas without the need of shutting down nodes or creating new nodes.
- Manipulate shard placement with the cluster reroute API. Move shards between nodes, we can cancel shard allocation process and we can also force shard allocation – everything on a live cluster.
- Check index and types existence
Configuration:
- Majority of configuration files can be modified dynamically.
- Update Mappings
- Define, retrieve and manage warning queries
- Shut down the entire cluster or a specific node
- Clear caches on the index level
This is all done over JSON, making it a lot more structured then the methods used in Solr.
Pro Rapid feature development
Another thing to keep in mind when choosing a search solution is the development momentum. ElasticSearch has quickly caught up to the competition and most of the currently missing features are due to be released in upcoming versions.
Pro Schemaless
Elasticsearch makes it easy to get started by not requiring you to define a schema before sending documents to be indexed. Elasticsearch will automatically guess field types for you, which although will not be as accurate as creating the mappings manually, is usually pretty accurate.
Elasticsearch also lets you manually define the mappings (index structure) before creating the index. One cool feature is if you miss a field or add a new field without defining the mapping, Elasticsearch will try to guess the Type for you.
Pro Allows multiple types of documents per index
Another useful and unique feature to Elasticsearch is the ability to have multiple types of documents in a single index. You can then facet, query or filter against all document types or a single type.
Pro Percolator (prospective search)
Essentially a reverse search. The percolator allows you to register queries against an index, and then send percolate requests which include a doc, and getting back the queries that match on that doc out of the set of registered queries. Not possible in Solr out of the box.
Pro Handles nested documents
ElasticSearch natively handles a nested document structure.
ElasticSearch will index nested documents as a separate indexes and are stored in such a way that allow quick join operations to access them. Nested documents require a nested query to access so that don't clutter results from standard queries.
Pro Extremely customisable
Since you have access to all the .yaml files, you can easily modify it to your needs.
Pro Can add many search engines
Have a vast choice for choosing search engines
Pro Can use a proxy
Using a proxy called Morty hides the IP address of the user
Pro Most Private Search engine
Since it can be hosted on your own server/ computer, it is very private, nothing leaves your computer.
No cookies or ads too
Pro Very fast
Since it is a Python program with a web interface, it's very very fast even on a poor internet connection
Pro Supports instant answers
Uses Google and Bing, and hence has the 'quick answers' feature of both the search engines.
Cons
Con Poor documentation
As a relatively new project, the documentation for ElasticSearch still leaves much to be desired. Documentation assumes that the user at least has familiarity with similar document stores, and is largely oriented toward those already familiar with other search solutions, such as Solr. Errors, while often quite simple to resolve, can be difficult to troubleshoot, as they are often insufficiently descriptive and missing from documentation. New users should be sure to check the tutorials section on elasticsearch.org for supplementary information lacking from the guide, such as more detailed installation instructions.
Con Prone to 'Split Brain' Situations
The Sematex blog explains a problem with the way Elasticsearch handles its clusters, called the 'Split Brain Situation':
Imagine a situation, where you cluster is divided into half, so half of your nodes don’t see the other half, for example because of the network failure. In such cases Elasticsearch will try to elect a new master in the cluster part that doesn’t have one and this will lead to creation of two independent clusters running at the same time. This can be limited with a small degree of configuration, but it can still happen.
Users have already run into this problem in production and ElasticSearch host Bonsai also have had issues with this problem as recently as March 2012.
Con Some missing features
Elasticsearch is currently missing the following features:
- Results Grouping / Field Collapsing
- Autocomplete
- Spell Checker/Did you mean (Available as a third-party plugin)
- Decision Tree Faceting
- Query Elevation
- Hash-based deduplication.
Con Not very mobile friendly
Needs WSL2 for windows, and works natively on macOS and Linux
But no support for Android or iOS