When comparing WTFPL vs Artistic License 1.0, the Slant community recommends WTFPL for most people. In the question“What are the best open-source licenses?” WTFPL is ranked 9th while Artistic License 1.0 is ranked 14th. The most important reason people chose WTFPL is:
It does not explicitly disclaim implied warranties which some rather idiotic legislations appear to follow.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro No disclaimer
It does not explicitly disclaim implied warranties which some rather idiotic legislations appear to follow.
Pro Protects the author
The author of the software avoids any risk for how the software may be used by others.
Pro Powerful and Strong
It requires change of files, so if you are making a copy of any software licensed with this license, you will have to PROVE that it is not the original software under another name. You are permitted to use the Standard Version and create and use Modified Versions for any purpose without restriction, provided that you do not Distribute the Modified Version.
Cons
Con Not fully proven to be valid
It has been used in many open source projects, but is not fully validated, although widely accepted as an open source license.
i.e. Proven in a court of law.