When comparing Artistic License 1.0 vs AGPL, the Slant community recommends AGPL for most people. In the question“What are the best open-source licenses?” AGPL is ranked 3rd while Artistic License 1.0 is ranked 14th. The most important reason people chose AGPL is:
Designed to ensure that end-users can access source code, even when applications run on remote web servers.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Protects the author
The author of the software avoids any risk for how the software may be used by others.
Pro Powerful and Strong
It requires change of files, so if you are making a copy of any software licensed with this license, you will have to PROVE that it is not the original software under another name. You are permitted to use the Standard Version and create and use Modified Versions for any purpose without restriction, provided that you do not Distribute the Modified Version.
Pro Protects user freedom in the cloud
Designed to ensure that end-users can access source code, even when applications run on remote web servers.
Pro Ensures that derivitave works are also protected by strong copyleft
Works extending the original must be licensed in a similar fashion to the AGPL, preserving and extending the user freedoms originally granted.
Pro Protects the author
The author of the software avoids any risk for how the software may be used by others.
Pro Ensures source access
Designed to make sure users have the freedom to access source code.