When comparing GPLv3 vs Artistic License 1.0, the Slant community recommends GPLv3 for most people. In the question“What are the best open-source licenses?” GPLv3 is ranked 4th while Artistic License 1.0 is ranked 14th. The most important reason people chose GPLv3 is:
Requires people building on your work to licence it for others to use.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Copyleft
Requires people building on your work to licence it for others to use.
Pro Ensures that the software does not become proprietary
Pro Protects the author
The author of the software avoids any risk for how the software may be used by others.
Pro Powerful and Strong
It requires change of files, so if you are making a copy of any software licensed with this license, you will have to PROVE that it is not the original software under another name. You are permitted to use the Standard Version and create and use Modified Versions for any purpose without restriction, provided that you do not Distribute the Modified Version.
Cons
Con Limits the developer's ability to package or use other libraries/software
Con Copyright
Requires people building on your work to license it the same way you did. Good if you want to pull their code into your project, but issues for potential end users can arise.