When comparing Apple Wireless Keyboard vs TypeMatrix 2030, the Slant community recommends Apple Wireless Keyboard for most people. In the question“What are the best keyboards for programming?” Apple Wireless Keyboard is ranked 20th while TypeMatrix 2030 is ranked 22nd. The most important reason people chose Apple Wireless Keyboard is:
Visually more appealing than your typical all-black keyboard.
Ranked in these QuestionsQuestion Ranking
Pros
Pro Aesthetics
Visually more appealing than your typical all-black keyboard.
Pro Solid, but compact
Achieves a solid feel without feeling heavy or bulky.
Pro Takes up little space
A small keyboard means your mouse and/or trackpad can be closer to you, while having your keyboard right in front of you.
Pro Wireless
Being wireless makes it easy to carry around in your backpack and also means less wire clutter on the desk.
Pro Very lightweight keys
The easy-click keys allow minimum effort when typing.
Pro Fully compatible with any MacBook series keyboard
You will be instantly familiar with MacBook keyboards.
Pro Tenkeyless
this keyboard is compact since it doesn't have the numpad.
Pro Works with iPad
This keyboard can be used with iPads.
Pro Ergonomic keyboard
The matrix layout reduces the travel distance of fingers. The keys feature membrane switches with double-scissor substrate, which are quite comfortable and very quiet.
Pro The HOME, END, ARROW keys and PG UP, PG Down are close together and on a nice spot on the keyboard.
Pro Compact
This keyboard has a small footprint, only 324 by 133 mm. This not only leaves more room on the desk, but also and mainly reduces the lateral travel distance of the right hand to grab the mouse. It still offers a good numeric keypad thanks to the matrix layout.
Pro Skins
Numerous skins are available, making it simple to keep the keyboard clean and even quieter. They also allow for multiple layouts.
Pro Increased typing accuracy
This keyboard's matrix layout allows for increased typing accuracy. It gets rid of the typewriter keyboard legacy in favor of a more logical layout.
Pro BÉPO and Dvorak layouts
These layouts are not easy to find, especially the first one. While they don't necessarily increase the typing speed, they greatly reduce the travel distance of the fingers, and have a much better distribution of the keys than regular AZERTY or QWERTY layouts.
Cons
Con Uncomfortable typing experience
Like the other Apple chiclet keyboards, it is not meant for touch typing: the switches are mushy and lack the tactile feedback, the keycaps are flat and so is the keyboard profile (not DSA or DCS, just plain ... flat).
Con It's missing some useful keys
It doesn't have dedicated Insert, Home, End, Page Up or Page Down keys.
Con Tenkeyless
This keyboard doesn't have a numeric pad.
Con Works well only with Apple gear
It doesn't work properly with hardware that's not from Apple.
Con The skins won't last forever and are expensive to replace
Con Unusual layout
The central position of the Enter and Backspace keys, on top of the matrix arrangement, requires some time to get used to.