Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing Leopold Tenkeyless Tactile Touch vs Let's Split, the Slant community recommends Leopold Tenkeyless Tactile Touch for most people. In the question“What are the best mechanical keyboards?” Leopold Tenkeyless Tactile Touch is ranked 14th while Let's Split is ranked 23rd. The most important reason people chose Leopold Tenkeyless Tactile Touch is:
The Leopold Tenkeyless Tactile Touch uses Cherry stabilizers on all of its keys.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Cherry stabilizers
The Leopold Tenkeyless Tactile Touch uses Cherry stabilizers on all of its keys.
Pro Grainy keycaps
This Leopold keyboard ships with PBT (short for "polybutylene terephthalate") keycaps which have a grainy texture that some might prefer as it helps prevent fingers from slipping. They are also known to withstand wear well.
Pro High quality components for a low price
The practical design of this keyboard is typical of high-end mechanical keyboards, only differing in the details. The matte black chassis has rounded corners and a simple design. This keyboard uses Cherry MX switches, common among keyboards that cost significantly more than the Leopold.
Pro Removable USB cable
While this might not seem like a big deal, having to replace your beloved keyboard because the cable has been broken through frequent wrapping can be frustrating.
Pro DIY
You can really make this board your own. The seperated space bar makes it even more fun than the regular Planck because you can program both space bars differently. You can also get the keys much more easily because you just need a pair of single key width keys.
Pro Split layout
You can set this board up in a very ergonomic manner
Cons
Con No backlighting makes night-time use harder
Backlighting is common among high-end keyboards, but the Leopold doesn't have this feature. While most users looking for a mechanical keyboard will be able to type without looking at the keys, sometimes the special characters can still be hit or miss. In the dark, it might take a few tries before getting the intended special character.
Con Easily bends
This keyboard easily suffers from a bit of flexing, something other keyboards in this price range don't suffer from.
Con No extra features (such as macros or USB passthrough)
This is an affordable board, therefore it lacks some of the more premium features found on more expensive boards. It doesn't have any macro capabilities which can be useful for heavy users (macros are recorded key sequences which can be activated with a single button press - these can be used in games to automate some tasks, or in other programs to get repetitive tasks done quicker). There's also no USB passthrough option. Some keyboards let you plug your mouse or a USB key right into the keyboard, which helps keep cables looking tidier, while being more accessible.
Con DIY
Most people just want to buy a keyboard so that they can have it and type on it. But if you're ordering an ortholinear 40% split keyboard, you've probably already got strong enough opinions on switches, key layouts, and keycaps, that you're not going to be very satisfied with a mass market keyboard anyway.
Con Somehow cheaper to spec out than a Planck
This keyboard is based on the Planck. You would think that the Planck, what with its popularity, would cost more. Somehow, it's actually cheaper. This actually has to do with the case/frame. Instead of ordering a really nice prefabricated case, you end up ordering laser cut panels and spacers to create a frame to hold the whole thing high enough off your desk to type comfortably.
