Add to Chrome
Add to Edge
Add to Firefox
Add to Opera
Add to Brave
Add to SafariWhen comparing PC Soft Windev vs Claris FileMaker, the Slant community recommends PC Soft Windev for most people. In the question“What are the best Microsoft Access alternatives?” PC Soft Windev is ranked 4th while Claris FileMaker is ranked 13th. The most important reason people chose PC Soft Windev is:
The express version is free, but limited.
Specs
Question Ranking
Pros
Pro Free version
The express version is free, but limited.
Pro Multi database
HFSQL, Access, AS/400 & IBM i, Oracle, SQL Server, DB2, MySQL, Informix, PostgreSQL, Progress, Sybase, xBase, SQLite, MariaDB, Hadoop (HBASE, Hive, HDFS), MongoDB, Memcached, Redis ...
Pro Rapid deployment
Can use built-in templates or add-ons to deploy your solution quickly.
Pro Large support community
Pro Low code
The platform is low code and for non-developers to use.
Pro Compatible for small or large apps
Pro Integrations with other platforms is simple
Straightforward and simple to integrate FileMaker with other platforms.
Pro Owned by Apple
A stable, reliable, and trustworthy platform owned by Apple.
Pro Easily customizable and flexible
Easy to customize for business needs.
Pro Hosting and sharing is simple
Cons
Con Each (yearly) release is buggy, and these bugs are not corrected until, at best, the next release, that brings other bugs ; you buy each one hoping for the best, but it never improve
Con Relatively unknown
It can be hard to find documentation.
Con Outdated look and feel
Con Will need to invest some time into learning the basics
Have to spend some time to get to know the database design and scripting, slightly longer learning curve with FileMaker than with other similar platforms.
Con Not executable
Requires software install and maintain on all clients.
Con Licensing can be a barrier to entry
Licensing can be expensive.
